From Bandung to the Constitution: Post-Colonial Constitutional Values in Indonesia, India, and South Africa
Keywords:
Bandung Principles, Post-Colonial Constitutionalism, Constitutional Identity, Global South ConstitutionalismAbstract
Post-colonial constitutionalism in Asia and Africa has often been analyzed through domestic constitutional transitions or global human rights frameworks, while the normative legacy of the 1955 Bandung Conference remains largely confined to diplomatic history and international relations. This separation has obscured the extent to which Bandung Principles—such as anti-colonialism, sovereign equality, non-intervention, and self-determination—have informed the internal normative architecture and constitutional identity of post-colonial states. This article aims to examine how these Bandung-inspired norms have been internalized as constitutional values within selected Asian and African constitutional systems. Employing a normative legal research design with statutory, comparative, and philosophical approaches, the study conducts a selective comparative analysis of Indonesia, India, and South Africa. The article offers a novel conceptual reframing of the Bandung Principles as post-colonial constitutional values rather than merely diplomatic or political commitments. It demonstrates that Bandung constitutes a shared normative reference that continues to shape constitutional ethos, identity, and interpretive orientation across divergent constitutional trajectories. The analysis reveals that while Indonesia reflects an ethos-based constitutionalization closely aligned with foundational constitutional narratives, India and South Africa exhibit distinct pathways mediated by judicial culture and institutional design. By bridging diplomatic history and constitutional theory, this study contributes to comparative constitutional law by advancing a Global South perspective that recognizes historical experience and normative plurality as sources of constitutional normativity. In doing so, the article responds to its research objective by establishing Bandung as an enduring constitutional framework that informs contemporary post-colonial constitutional development beyond historical commemoration.
References
Acharya, Amitav. “Studying the Bandung Conference from a Global Ir Perspective.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 70, no. 4 (2016): 342–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2016.1168359.
Amiruddin, and Zainal Asikin. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Rajawali Pers, 2012.
Banat, Sami. “Orientalist Constitutionalism: How Western Imperialism Influenced the Rise of the Post-Colonial State.” Jindal Global Law Review 14, no. 1 (2023): 49–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41020-023-00188-x.
Barnard-Naudé, Jaco. “Decolonising the Real: Transformative Constitutionalism and the Unconscious.” Afrika Focus 36, no. 1 (2023): 111–42. https://doi.org/10.1163/2031-356x-20230107.
Brigg, Morgan, Lee Wilson, Frans De Jalong, and Muhadi Sugiono. “Diversity, Democratisation and Indonesian Leadership.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 70, no. 4 (2016): 407–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2016.1153599.
Hilbink, Lisa. “The Constituted Nature of Constituents’ Interests: Historical and Ideational Factors in Judicial Empowerment.” Political Research Quarterly 62, no. 4 (2009): 781–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912909349628.
Ismail, Dian Ekawaty, Novendri M. Nggilu, and Irlan Puluhulawa. Metode Penelitian Hukum: Teori, Aplikasi, Dan Inovasi Dalam Penelitian Hukum. Edited by Tiara Oktaviana Namira Daud. Ruang Karya, 2025.
Jia, Bing Bing. “From Asian-African Solidarity to a Community of Common Destiny: An Evolving Chinese Perspective of the International Legal Order.” AJIL Unbound 119 (2025): 199–203. https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2025.10023.
Kebebew, Tadesse, Laura Turley, Danilo Türk, and Mark Zeitoun. “Bandung Principles: A Path to Equitable Global Water Governance?” International Journal of Water Resources Development 41, no. 4 (2025): 846–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2024.2448149.
Mayekiso, Cwenga. “Judicial Interpretation, Constitutional Inclusivity, and Socio-Economic Rights of Foreign Nationals in South Africa.” African Journal of Law and Justice System 4, no. 3 (2025): 127–51. https://doi.org/10.31920/2753-3123/2025/v4n3a7.
Nggilu, Novendri M, Wahidullah, Novi Noviawati, and Dian Ekawaty Ismail. “Indonesia’s Constitutional Identity: A Comparative Study of Islamic Constitutionalism.” De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah 16, no. 2 (2024): 480–500.
Nunn, Neil, and Madeline Whetung. “Anticolonialism.” In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Elsevier, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10800-5.
Örnek, Cangül. “Bandung Conference.” In The Encyclopedia of Postcolonial Studies, 1st ed., edited by Sangeeta Ray and Henry Schwarz. Wiley, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119076506.wbeps026.
Otto, Dianne. “World Peace.” In Research Handbook on Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL), edited by Antony Anghie, B. S. Chimni, Michael Fakhri, Karin Mickelson, and Vasuki Nesiah. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2025. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789901528.00013.
Paik, Wondam. “The 60th Anniversary of the Bandung Conference and Asia.” Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 17, no. 1 (2016): 148–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2016.1150246.
Phillips, Andrew. “Beyond Bandung: The 1955 Asian-African Conference and Its Legacies for International Order.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 70, no. 4 (2016): 329–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2016.1153600.
Rasool, Ebrahim. “South Africa at 30: What Lessons for Covenantal Pluralism from a Laboratory of Ubuntu and Nation Building?” The Review of Faith & International Affairs 22, no. 4 (2024): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2024.2414581.
Roux, Theunis. “Grand Narratives of Transition and the Quest for Democratic Constitutionalism in India and South Africa.” Verfassung in Recht Und Übersee 57, no. 1 (2024): 5–71. https://doi.org/10.5771/0506-7286-2024-1-5.
Saksena, Priyasha. “Bandung, State-Making, and Citizenship in South Asia.” AJIL Unbound 119 (2025): 210–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2025.10025.
Setiawati, Siti Mutiah. “The Role of Indonesian Government in Middle East Conflict Resolution: Consistent Diplomacy or Strategic Shifts?” Frontiers in Political Science 6 (March 2024): 1304108. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1304108.
Singh, Prabhakar. “Finding Foreign Relations Law in India: A Decolonial Dissent.” In Encounters between Foreign Relations Law and International Law, 1st ed., edited by Helmut Philipp Aust and Thomas Kleinlein. Cambridge University Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108942713.006.
Singh, V. P. “Judicial Activism as an Essential Tool for the Protection and Expansion of Human Rights in India.” Kutafin Law Review 10, no. 1 (2023): 88–109. https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2023.1.23.088-109.
Tremml, Kathrin. “Creating Legitimacy and Exercising Political Power: An Analysis of the Functions of the Chinese Constitutional Preamble Based on a Linguistic Study.” In Complexity Thinking and China’s Demography Within and Beyond Mainland China, edited by Armando Aliu. Springer Nature Singapore, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0172-8_5.
Umar, Ahmad Rizky Mardhatillah. “Rethinking the Legacies of Bandung Conference: Global Decolonization and the Making of Modern International Order.” Asian Politics & Policy 11, no. 3 (2019): 461–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.12473.
Weber, Heloise, and Poppy Winanti. “The ‘Bandung Spirit’ and Solidarist Internationalism.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 70, no. 4 (2016): 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2016.1167834.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Usman Rasyid, Rismanto Kaku (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
